be a mistaken conclusion. For in the second of the two verses the Sonship is ontological. This is clear from the fact that the more excellent name is contrasted with the name of the angels. This comparison of Christ with the angels is one that is drawn out to some length through the chapter. The angels are contrasted with Christ in respect to their nature. Hence also Christ is referred to in respect to His nature. God having spoken through a Son omits the definite article. Therefore the term is generic,